Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Transl Androl Urol ; 10(12): 4376-4383, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2262244

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Erectile dysfunction (ED) is suspected to be the symptom manifestation of COVID-19. However, scarce data was presented this day. Our study was conducted to determine the prevalence of ED and its associated factors among Thai patients with COVID-19. METHODS: Sexually active males with COVID-19, hospitalized between May and July 2021 at one university hospital in Bangkok, were screened for erectile dysfunction by the International Index of Erectile Function 5 (IIEF-5). Demographic data and COVID-19 treatment history were collected. Mental health status, including depression and anxiety, was evaluated with the Thai Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9) and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7), respectively. The sample size was calculated, and logistic regression was used to analyze the association. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-three men with COVID-19 were recruited. ED prevalence was 64.7%, of which severity was mostly mild. Logistic regression, adjusted for age, BMI, and medical comorbidities, portrayed a significant association between ED and mental health status. Higher risk of ED was found in participants with major depression [adjusted OR 8.45, 95% CI: 1.01-70.96, P=0.049] and higher GAD-7 total score [adjusted OR 1.15, 95% CI: 1.01-1.31, P=0.039]. CONCLUSIONS: Thai patients with COVID-19 had high prevalence of ED, which was associated with mental disorders. Thus, screening for mental problems is recommended in individuals with COVID-19 and ED.

2.
Transplant Direct ; 8(11): e1393, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2097543

ABSTRACT

Two doses of coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination provide suboptimal immune response in transplant patients. Mycophenolic acid (MPA) is one of the most important factors that blunts the immune response. We studied the immune response to the extended primary series of 2 doses of AZD1222 and a single dose of BNT162b2 in kidney transplant patients who were on the standard immunosuppressive regimen compared to those on the MPA-sparing regimen. Methods: The kidney transplant recipients who were enrolled into the study were divided into 2 groups based on their immunosuppressive regimen. Those on the standard immunosuppressive regimen received tacrolimus (TAC), MPA, and prednisolone (standard group). The patients in the MPA-sparing group received mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTORi) with low dose TAC plus prednisolone (MPA-sparing group). The vaccination consisted of 2 doses of AZD1222 and a single dose of BNT162b2. Results: A total of 115 patients completed the study. There were 76 (66.08%) patients in the standard group and 39 (33.91%) patients in the MPA-sparing group. The overall median anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) S antibody level at 4 wk after vaccine completion was 676.64 (interquartile range = 6.02-3644.03) BAU/mL with an 80% seroconversion rate. The MPA-sparing group achieved higher anti-SARS-CoV-2 S antibody level compared to the standard group (3060.69 and 113.91 BAU/mL, P < 0.001). The seroconversion rate of MPA-sparing and standard groups were 97.4% and 71.1%, respectively (P < 0.001). The anti-HLA antibodies did not significantly increase after vaccination. Conclusions: The extended primary series of 2 doses of AZD1222 and a single dose of BNT162b2 provided significant humoral immune response. The MPA-sparing regimen with mTORi and low dose TAC had a higher ant-SARS-CoV-2 S antibody level and seroconversion rate compared to the participants in the standard regimen.

3.
PLoS One ; 17(10): e0276429, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2079768

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Several studies confirm multiple complications after COVID-19 infection, including men's sexual health, which is caused by both physical and psychological factors. However, studies focusing on long-term effects among recovered patients are still lacking. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the erectile function at three months after COVID-19 recovery along with its predicting factors. METHODS: We enrolled all COVID-19 male patients, who were hospitalized from May to July 2021, and declared to be sexually active within the previous two weeks. Demographic data, mental health status, and erectile function were collected at baseline and prospectively recollected three months after hospital discharge. To determine changes between baseline and the follow-up, a generalized linear mixed effect model (GLMM) was used. Also, logistic regression analysis was used to identify the associating factors of erectile dysfunction (ED) at three months. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-three men with COVID-19 participated. Using GLMM, ED prevalence at three months after recovery was 50.3%, which was significantly lower compared with ED prevalence at baseline (64.7%, P = 0.002). Declination of prevalence of major depression and anxiety disorder was found, but only major depression reached statistical significance (major depression 13.7% vs. 1.4%, P < 0.001, anxiety disorder 5.2% vs. 2.8% P = 0.22). Logistic regression, adjusted for BMI, medical comorbidities, and self-reported normal morning erection, showed a significant association between ED at three months and age above 40 years and diagnosis of major depression with adjusted OR of 2.65, 95% CI 1.17-6.01, P = 0.02 and 8.93, 95% CI 2.28-34.9, P = 0.002, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our study showed a high ED prevalence during the third month of recovery from COVID-19. The predicting factors of persistent ED were age over 40 years and diagnosis of major depression during acute infection.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Depressive Disorder, Major , Erectile Dysfunction , Humans , Male , Adult , Erectile Dysfunction/epidemiology , Erectile Dysfunction/etiology , Erectile Dysfunction/diagnosis , Follow-Up Studies , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Depressive Disorder, Major/complications
4.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 10(10)2022 Oct 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2071918

ABSTRACT

Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) have a suboptimal immune response to COVID-19 vaccination due to the effects of immunosuppression, mostly mycophenolic acid (MPA). This study investigated the benefits of switching from the standard immunosuppressive regimen (tacrolimus (TAC), MPA, and prednisolone) to a regimen of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor (mTORi), TAC and prednisolone two weeks pre- and two weeks post-BNT162b2 booster vaccination. A single-center, opened-label pilot study was conducted in KTRs, who received two doses of ChAdOx-1 and a single dose of BNT162b2. The participants were randomly assigned to continue the standard regimen (control group, n = 14) or switched to a sirolimus (an mTORi), TAC, and prednisolone (switching group, n = 14) regimen two weeks before and two weeks after receiving a booster dose of BNT162b2. The anti-SARS-CoV-2 S antibody level after vaccination in the switching group was significantly greater than the control group (4051.0 [IQR 3142.0-6466.0] BAU/mL vs. 2081.0 [IQR 1077.0-3960.0] BAU/mL, respectively; p = 0.01). One participant who was initially seronegative in the control group remained seronegative after the booster dose. These findings suggest humoral immune response benefits of switching the standard immunosuppressive regimen to the regimen of mTORi, TAC, and prednisolone in KTRs during vaccination.

5.
BMC Infect Dis ; 21(1): 1174, 2021 Nov 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1528679

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 vaccines provide renewed hope in the fight against the recent pandemic. To ensure widespread vaccination, it is crucial to analyze vaccine willingness and its determinants among physicians, key health care influencers. This study aimed to assess acceptance rate and identify factors associated with vaccine hesitancy among Thai physicians. METHODS: A cross-sectional online-based questionnaire was distributed to all physicians at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital during March 31, 2021 to April 30, 2021 in order to assess their attitudes toward receiving the COVID-19 vaccine. Reasons for vaccine acceptance and refusal as well as predictors of vaccine hesitancy were analyzed by bivariate and multivariable analysis. RESULTS: A total of 705 complete responses were received with 95.6% (n = 675) of physicians expressing willingness to receive a COVID-19 vaccine. Only one of the 31 physicians (4.4%) who expressed a hesitancy or unwillingness to be vaccinated was a faculty member; the others were physicians-in-training. Approximately one-fifths of physicians surveyed were also not willing to recommend the vaccine to their family members (21.4%, n = 151) or patients (18.7%, n = 132). Using multivariable logistic regression, vaccine hesitancy was independently associated with preference for particular vaccines over the government allocated option, especially for mRNA vaccine (aOR 8.86; 95% CI 1.1-71.54; p = 0.041). Vaccine literacy showed an inverse relationship (aOR 0.34; 95% CI 0.13-0.9; p = 0.029) with vaccine hesitancy. Uncertainty of the vaccine efficacy (83.9%) and fear of adverse events (48.4%) were major concerns contributing to vaccine hesitancy. CONCLUSION: This study revealed a high rate of physician willingness to take the COVID-19 vaccine especially among staffs; however, a significant proportion would not currently suggest vaccination to their families or patients. Restrictions on vaccine choice and vaccine illiteracy, together with concerns over adverse effects and uncertainty of efficacy, were associated with negative attitudes toward vaccination. To raise acceptance of the vaccination program, efforts should be made to balance individual preference for vaccine type in addition to increasing the availability of accurate data on safety and efficacy for each vaccine.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Physicians , Vaccines , COVID-19 Vaccines , Cross-Sectional Studies , Hospitals, Teaching , Hospitals, University , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Thailand , Universities , Vaccination
6.
J Epidemiol Glob Health ; 11(3): 289-295, 2021 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1315944

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the current global incidence and mortality of COVID-19 and also explored the associated factors including geographic variations, transmission scenarios, country economic status, and healthcare performance. METHODS: The search was conducted in online databases based on reports from national authorities by March 28, 2021. Random-effects model meta-analyses and meta-regression analyses were used to generate summary estimates and explored sources of heterogeneity. RESULTS: The cumulative number of confirmed COVID-19 cases was 125,704,789 reported by 216 countries. The pooled Daily Cumulative Index (DCI) was 1423.87 cases/day which was highest in South America (2759.15 cases/day) followed by North America (2252.49 cases/day), Europe (1858.44 cases/day), Asia (1484.84 cases/day), Africa (193.09 cases/day), and Australia/Oceania (18.55 cases/day). The overall pooled mortality rate of COVID-19 was 1.53%. Higher income countries and countries with community transmission had higher DCI. By meta-regression, country total health expenditure per capita, percentage of universal health coverage, and total number of tests were associated with higher DCI. On the contrary, country Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita were negatively correlated with mortality rate. CONCLUSION: To date, 216 countries around the world are affected by COVID-19. Higher income, GDP, and countries' investments on heath are associated with higher DCI while higher GDP correlates with lower mortality. Community transmission route have more impact on the incidence and mortality of COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Australia , Europe , Humans , Incidence , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL